My first attempt at a "blog", whatever that means.

It seems that HP agrees that the Win8 UI is problematic.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2089403/ouch-hp-brings-windows-7-back-by-popular-demand.html

Sure, MS is rumored to be perhaps thinking about maybe bringing the start button back.  I wonder if this might open their eyes a bit.

 


Comments (Page 8)
8 PagesFirst 6 7 8 
on Jan 29, 2014

starkers
Thanks for posting this, Wiz, it has been helpful

You're welcome.

You too, MottiKhan

on Jan 29, 2014

starkers
Well there you go, it seems MS has backflipped again.

Yes, you can thank the Win 8 fiasco for that.

8 'should' have influenced a greater abandoning of XP by users....but needless to say it had bugger-all effect...

on Jan 29, 2014

Yes, you can thank the Win 8 fiasco for that.

For ever XP user that W8 failed to grab, W7 also failed to grab...just saying....

on Jan 29, 2014

Seleuceia



Quoting Jafo,
reply 107
Yes, you can thank the Win 8 fiasco for that.


For ever XP user that W8 failed to grab, W7 also failed to grab...just saying....
No, not really, Windows7's user base continues to grow as XP's drops. Win 8/8.1 is gaining ground on new adopters over Win 7, but that may be due in part to OEM installs.  I still doubt many 7 users are leaving it for 8 but XP users, that's another story. LINK

 That is a big change from November, where Win7 growth outpaced Win8 by a good margin.

http://www.techradar.com/us/news/software/operating-systems/windows-7-still-growing-faster-than-8-in-computing-markets-1206767

Former XP users are buying Win7, just not as fast as OEM's are shoving Win8 out the door

on Jan 29, 2014

Speaking only for myself as a "stuck on XP" user, I picked up a retail copy of Win7 after Win8 had been out for a little while.  I'm not claiming that I necessarily made the "right" choice, but that's exactly what I did.

on Jan 29, 2014

Wizard1956
No, not really, Windows7's user base continues to grow as XP's drops. Win 8/8.1 is gaining ground on new adopters over Win 7, but that may be due in part to OEM installs. I still doubt many 7 users are leaving it for 8 but XP users, that's another story. LINK
That is a big change from November, where Win7 growth outpaced Win8 by a good margin.
http://www.techradar.com/us/news/software/operating-systems/windows-7-still-growing-faster-than-8-in-computing-markets-1206767
Former XP users are buying Win7, just not as fast as OEM's are shoving Win8 out the door

While I don't disagree with anything you said, you're missing my point...

If someone is using Windows XP, then they aren't using W7 or W8 unless they have multiple OSes...for simplicity, I'm going to focus only on those with one OS -- so, any person who still is using XP decided, for whatever reason, not to adopt W8...but, they also then (for whatever reason) decided not to adopt W7....

Blaming the large amount of XP users on W8 is silly...current XP users weren't persuaded to switch by W7 either, so as far as I'm concerned you can blame W7 as much as you can W8 for the large amount of current XP users...

on Jan 29, 2014



Quoting starkers, reply 103Well there you go, it seems MS has backflipped again.

Yes, you can thank the Win 8 fiasco for that.

8 'should' have influenced a greater abandoning of XP by users....but needless to say it had bugger-all effect...

Yeah, it's all Win 8's fault, as is the decline of PC sales; the rise of tablet sales; the decline of rainforests and an outbreak of bubonic plague.

on Jan 29, 2014

Seleuceia
Blaming the large amount of XP users on W8 is silly...current XP users weren't persuaded to switch by W7 either, so as far as I'm concerned you can blame W7 as much as you can W8 for the large amount of current XP users...

No...I'm blaming the non-existent acceleration of XP departees on the lack of incentive afforded by yet another 'potential' replacement for XP.

7 has done more to reduce market share of XP than 8 ever will...and that's a cold, hard fact....that MS knows [now] and prompts them to play catch up with supposed 'improvements' and rapid release of 9.

7 has replaced a lot of XP share...and if 8 had been any good [as in markedly better than 7] they would have expected further reduction of XP share.

That has not happened to any significant degree, even though it promotes standardization across all that hardware that is supposed to be a GOOD THING ...so instead they have had to bite the bullet and prolong XP yet again.

 

http://betanews.com/2014/01/29/microsoft-doles-out-some-tips-to-help-you-avoid-the-start-screen-in-windows-8-1/ 

8 PagesFirst 6 7 8